Internal Monthly Survey for RFCs & NWC

NOTE: This survey uses the term “water forecast” to encompass the primary forecast information produced by RFCs. This includes (but is not limited to) river flow and stage forecasts, reservoir levels, and other water resource related information.

Demographics

Select
Caret IconCaret symbol
What is your position?*

If your position is not listed in the previous question, select Other and enter it here:


Forecast Process and Quality

1) Have you noticed inconsistencies among WFOs or between regions which have affected water forecast quality?*
2) Have you observed any examples of water forecast improvements due to the CFP?*
3) Have you observed any examples of water forecast degradations due to the CFP?*
4) Does the collaborated CFP yield a more accurate forecast than the non-collaborated CFP?*
5) Did you get added value from the collaboration?*

Rating Scale: 1 (no value) to 10 (exceptional value)

6) Was the time invested in collaboration worthwhile?*

Rating Scale: 1 (not worthwhile) to 10 (extremely worthwhile)

IDSS

7) Have you observed any examples of IDSS improvements due to the CFP?*
8) Have you observed any examples of IDSS being degraded due to the CFP?*
9) Have you received feedback from core partners regarding water forecasts that can be directly attributed to the CFP?*
10) How would you categorize time savings unlocked by the CFP, as it relates to QPF and additional time to do IDSS?*

Summary

11) Do you agree with this statement? “Overall, the CFP has contributed positively to our ability to provide quality water forecasts and associated IDSS”.*
12) On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the overall success of the CFP?*

Rate based on the scale: 1 = Very Unsuccessful 5 = Neither Successful or Unsuccessful 10 = Extremely Successful _______________________________

If none, please write NONE